Quarterly Publication

Cooperative and Competitive Game Analysis between Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia in Management of the Arash (Al-Durra) Gas Field

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Regional and International Politics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 MA Student in International Political Economy, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor and Faculty Member, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The Arash (Al-Durra) gas field, located in the northern Persian Gulf, is a shared natural resource claimed by Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. Ongoing maritime boundary disputes have made the development of this field a geopolitical and legal challenge. Game theory is used in this research to model the strategic interactions between the three states under various cooperation and competition scenarios. The results indicate that trilateral cooperation would be the greatest economic and security benefits for all parties; however, political tensions and legal barriers, particularly Iran’s non-membership in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), hinder such outcomes in the short term. Iran experiences the greatest losses under competitive strategies, while Saudi Arabia and Kuwait benefit more from bilateral agreements. The study also explores how Iran’s legal position could be strengthened through accession to UNCLOS and the adoption of a flexible strategy that combines active diplomacy with cautious resource exploitation. This approach could improve Iran’s bargaining power and reduce its isolation in the dispute. The research offers a comprehensive analysis of the legal, geopolitical, and economic dimensions of the Arash field conflict and provides actionable policy recommendations to reduce tensions and promote equitable, long-term resource sharing in the region.

Highlights

  • Game theory reveals optimal strategies in the Al-Durra gas field dispute.
  • Iran's UNCLOS accession could boost its legal standing in maritime resources.
  • Strategic modeling shows Iran’s isolation harms long-term national interests.
  • Legal analysis stresses Iran’s non-ratification of UNCLOS as a key barrier.
  • Full cooperation is ideal but unstable due to regional rivalries.

Keywords

Subjects

Abdoli, G. (2007). Game theory and its applications (static and dynamic games with full information). Jahad University of Tehran.
Aljebori, N. S. F. J. (2024). International disputes over joint oil and gas fields in the Arab east region. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13(1), 2624–2635. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.1.1964
Al-Khudairi, T. (2023, October 17). Unresolved dispute between Kuwait, Iran over Durra (Arash) gas field. Anadolu Agency. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/unresolved-dispute-between-kuwait-iran-durra-arash-gas-field/2966133#
Colgan, J. D. (2012, September 13). The international political economy of petroleum: Exploring the political dynamics of global energy markets (Working paper). Heidelberg University. https://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/awi/peio/colgan_13.09.2012.pdf
Daneshfar, M. J. (2015). Qatar’s economic miracle through the use of the South Pars field. In National conference on Basij thinking, research, and resistance economy.
Gilpin, R. (2011). Global political economy: Understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Pursuit of Power and Peace. University of Chicago Press.
Morrow, J.D. (1994). Game Theory for Political Scientists. Princeton University Press.
Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48–49. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
Noruzizadeh, F., Goodarzi, M. and Masoudnia, H. (2022). Geopolitical and Geo-economical Role of Persian Gulf Energy (Oil & Gas) Transit in Implementing Islamic Republic of Iran's Regional Policy. Geopolitics Quarterly18(3), 228-255.
Rasanahiiis. (2023). THE AL-DURRA GAS FIELD CRISIS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR GULF-IRAN RECONCILIATION. https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/The-Al-Durra-Gas-Field-Crisis-and-Its-Implications-for-Gulf-Iran-Reconciliation.pdf
Ross, M. L. (2012). The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841929
Stokes, D., & Raphael, S. (2010). Global energy security and American hegemony. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Toufighi, S. P., Mehregan, M. and Jafarnejad, A. (2022). Modeling of Production Strategies from Common Offshore Gas Field with Game Theory Approach. Mathematics Interdisciplinary Research7(1), 21-44. doi: 10.22052/mir.2022.243449.1329 
Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill
Policy reports
Kechichian, J. A. (2020, January 29). Saudi-Kuwaiti tensions with Iran over offshore gas field. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/saudi-kuwaiti-tensions-iran-over-offshore-gas-field
The Al-Durra gas field crisis and its implications for Gulf-Iran reconciliation. (n.d.). International Institute for Iranian Studies. https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/monitoring-and-translation/reports/the-al-durra-gas-field-crisis-and-its-implications-for-gulf-iran-reconciliation/
News & commentary
Global Energy Monitor. (2025, February 22). Dorra Oil and Gas Field (Kuwait-Saudi Arabia-Iran) - Global Energy Monitor. https://www.gem.wiki/Dorra_Oil_and_Gas_Field_(Kuwait-Saudi_Arabia-Iran)
Press TV. (2023, July 9). Explainer: What’s Arash gas field row between Iran, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia? https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2023/07/09/706726/Explainer-Arash-Gas-Field-Iran-Kuwait-Saudi-Arabia
UNCLOS Debate. (n.d.). Iran. UNCLOS Debate. https://www.unclosdebate.org/keywords/iran
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (n.d.). https://www.imo.org/en/ourwork/legal/pages/unitednationsconventiononthelawofthesea.aspx
 
 
 

  • Receive Date 14 April 2025
  • Revise Date 14 May 2025
  • Accept Date 26 May 2025