Quarterly Publication

Petroleum Profitability: Comparison of the financial structure of oil con-tracts and determination of the appropriate contract "IPC, PSC, BUYBACK"

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management and Accounting, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Economics, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor., Department of Theoretical Economics, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
The choice of financial regime in oil-rich countries depends on proven reserves, exploration and production costs, geological characteristics, political risks, and oil market conditions. In this article, contractual components of three contracts IPC, BUYBACK, and PSC are introduced using Visual Basic programming language, and a model structure for a 42-season period scenar-io with oil prices is created. Also, modeling based on the parameters of the Shadegan oil field is another innovation of this work. The aim of this research is to investigate the effective indica-tors in the oil and gas industry contracts based on oil price scenarios. The results of this study show that many of the constraints of the reservoir owner country have been modified in the direction of protecting oil fields and effectively controlling contractor's fees in modified mutual agreement and production sharing contracts, and the financial system of the new oil contracts is more efficient in case of an oil price increase and in the final years of production compared to production sharing and buyback contracts. In this study, comparing indicators such as internal rate of return, payback period, profitability index, and the share of both parties in the contract based on real and simulated data showed that entering into new oil contracts in Iran, especially IPC in the Shadegan oil field, can protect the oil field, prevent uncontrolled oil extraction, and control contractor's revenues, leading to lower costs and higher revenues compared to buyback and production sharing contracts for the host country (Iran).

Highlights

The effects of fiscal regimes on investment choices in the oil and gas sector were analyzed by focusing on
comparing mutual buyback, Iran petroleum contract (IPC), and production sharing contract (PSC) in the
Shadegan field.
• Mutual buyback arrangements responded minimally to oil price changes due to their inherent fixed costs and
preset expenses before production.
• In scenarios of climbing oil prices, the profitability for contractors under the production sharing contract
notably increased.
• Superior returns were noted under the Iran petroleum contract, with every dollar invested yielding $1.3,
alongside the most rapid investment recovery compared to other contracts.
• The study suggests that newer contract models like the IPC should be more financially effective and
responsive to market variations, providing stakeholders with critical insights for selecting advantageous

Keywords

Subjects

Al Jabri, S., Raghavan, M., Vespignani, J. (2022). Oil prices and fiscal policy in an oil-exporter country: Empirical evidence from Oman. Energy Economics, 111(1), 106103–106114. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106103.
Algozhina, A. (2022). Monetary policy rule, exchange rate regime, and fiscal policy cyclicality in a developing oil economy. Journal Energy Economics, 112(1), 106126–106132. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106126.
Banda W. (2023). A system dynamics model for assessing the impact of fiscal regimes on mining projects. Resources Policy, 81(1), 103408. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103408.
Bramki Yazdi, H, Manzour, D, and Shadkar, M. (2020). Optimization of upstream oil and gas contracts: Principal-agent model. Journal of Economic Research, 20(76), 187–222. doi: 10.22054/joer.2020.11904.
Diouf, A., Laporte, B. (2017). Oil contracts and government take: Issues for Senegal and developing countries. J. Energy and Dev, 43(1), 213–222. URL: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jeldv43&div=14&id=&page=
Farimani, FM., Mu, X., Sahebhonar, H., Taherifard, A. (2020). An economic analysis of Iranian petroleum contract. Petroleum Science, 17(1), 1451–61. DOI: 10.1007/s12182-020-00486-2.
Feng Z, Zhang SB, Gao Y. (2014). On oil investment and production: A comparison of production sharing contracts and buyback contracts. Energy Economics, 42(1), 395–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.01.010.
Ghandi, A., Lin, CY. (2012). Do Iran’s buyback service contracts lead to optimal production? The case of Soroosh and Nowrooz. Energy Policy, 42(1), 181–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.070.
Humphreys, M., Sachs, J., Stiglitz, JE., (2007). Editors. Escaping the resource curse. Columbia university press.
Jolai, F., Zamani, F. (2022). Dynamic Reservoir and Stochastic Oil Pricing Model of IPC Contracts: Optimizing and Sensitivity Analyzing. Journal Industrial Management, 14(1), 143–167. DOI: 10.22059/imj.2022.328510.1007857.
Kaiser, M. J. (2007). Fiscal system analysis—concessionary systems. Energy, 32(11), 2135–2147. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.04.013.
Keshavarz, M., Iranmanesh, H., Dehghan, R. (2021). Modelling the Iranian Petroleum Contract fiscal regime using bargaining game theory to guide contract negotiators. Petroleum Science, 18(6): 1887–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.petsci.2021.09.018.
Kohan Hoosh Nejad, R., Manzoor, D., Amani, M. (2018). Economic Evaluation of Fiscal Regime of Buyback Contracts in Comparison with Production Sharing Contracts (Case Study: Azadegan Oil Field). Journal Iranian Economic Review, 22(2), 579–598. DOI: 10.22059/IER.2018.66167.
Li, C., Jiang, M., Ge, H., Li, Z., Luo, D. (2017). An operational risk analysis of Iran Buyback contract and its policy implication. Energy Strategy Reviews, 16(1), 43–53. Doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2017.02.003.
Lirong, D. O., Kunye, X. I., Yebo, D. U., Li, W. A., Zhang, X., Cheng, D., Ying, H. (2022). Exploration discovery and hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of the Doseo strike-slip and inverted basin, Chad. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 49(2), 247–256. DOI: 10.1016/S1876-3804(22)60021-1
Marcel, V. (2006). Oil titans: National oil companies in the Middle East. Brookings Institution Press. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt12879z9.
McLean, S. (2023). Exploring the elements of an optimal hydrocarbon fiscal regime. Repositorio.  URL: https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/48720.
Mian, M.A. (2011). Project Economics and Decision Analysis, Vol. 1: Deterministic Models. 2nd Edition, PennWell Publishing Co., Tulsa. URL: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1634022.
Nakhle, C. (2010). 4 Petroleum fiscal regimes: evolution and challenges. In The taxation of petroleum and minerals (pp. 105–137). Routledge.
Pedra PP. (2020). The Impact of Fiscal Incentives in the Pre-Salt Oil Business in Brazil.  Doctoral dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
Ramírez-Cendrero, JM., Wirth, E. (2024). Oil fiscal regime and national oil companies. The hydrocarbon sector in Argentina 2003–2022. The Extractive Industries and Society, 17(1): 101399–10412. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101399.
Sahebhonar, H., Lotfalipour, M. R., Hooshmand, M., Feizi, M. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Fiscal Terms of Iran Petroleum Contract (IPC) and Production Sharing Contract (PSC): Case Study of South Azadegan Field. Quarterly Journal of Applied Theories of Economics, 4(1), 87–118. URL: https://ecoj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_6108.html?lang=en.
Talebian Moghaddam, H., Shirkavand, S., Dehghan, R., Mohammadi, S. (2023). Evaluating the Impact of Economic Components of IPC and PSC Contracts on Cumulative Production of Oil Fields: A Case Study of Foroozan Oil Field. Quarterly Energy Economics Review, 19(76), 29–56. URL: http://iiesj.ir/article-1-1520-en.html.
Tordo, S. (2007), Fiscal Systems for Hydrocarbons: Design Issues, The World Bank: www. worldenergyoutlook.org, Pages 1–67.

  • Receive Date 23 May 2024
  • Revise Date 30 June 2024
  • Accept Date 01 July 2024