Quarterly Publication

The Conceptual Framework of Supplier Relationship Development in the Abadan Refinery with a Focus on Value Co-Creation Based on the Grounded Theory

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management, Khorramshahr International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramshahr, Iran

2 Department of Business Management, Khoramshahr International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khoramshahr, Iran

Abstract
The current research was conducted with the aim of providing a conceptual framework for the development of relations with suppliers in Abadan Oil Refining Company. The research method is qualitative and based on the data theory of the foundation. To collect data, semi-structured interview was used and data analysis was done by Strauss and Corbin method and paradigm model. The statistical population was experts and managers with experience in Abadan Oil Refining Company, from which a sample of 21 people was selected after reaching theoretical saturation. Sampling has been done theoretically and using targeted (judgmental) techniques. The results of the analysis of the data obtained from the interviews, during the process of open, central and selective coding, led to the creation of models of the development model of the relationship with the suppliers of consumer products in the Abadan Oil Refining Company based on the data theory of the foundation, which ultimately provided a model for the development model. Communication with suppliers was identified. The findings of this research indicate that for the success of the development model of the relationship with the suppliers of consumer products, company managers can pay attention to the identified categories and subcategories and if they match the conditions of the company, from this category. use In addition, this research shows the need to pay attention to the development patterns of relationships with suppliers.

Highlights

• The data analysis led to the introduction of three components: organizational structures, means of 
communication, and organizational context.
• The Abadan refinery’s supplier relationship approach toward value cocreation was introduced.
• The data analysis led to the introduction of legal requirements, industry characteristics, environmental 
conditions, and national resources protection.
• The data analysis led to the introduction of strategic partnerships, supplier risk mitigation and 
empowerment, supplier significance and level identification, and management system reform.
• The data analysis led to the introduction of organizational consequences, national consequences, supplier 
and stakeholder consequences, rational decision-making, and effective and continuous value cocreation

Keywords

Subjects

AbbasPoor, P. Arbabi, H. and Sobhieh, M. H. (2016). Explaining value creation functions in project-oriented organizations of the Oil industry. Public Organizations Management, 4(1), 13–28. 
Aeeni, M. Abdolhosseinzadeh, M. (2017). analyzing the quality of representing the concept of political legitimacy in the discourse of Iran’s constitutional ulama. Journal of Political Thought in Islam, 3(11), 127–165.
Akbari, M. Ebrahimpur, M. (2016). The effect of institutional factors on the sustainable performance of firms. Business management perspective, 15(28), 81–100.
Akbari, N. Jamshidi, H. (2011). The effect of targeting subsidies on income and expenditure of metropolises. Journal of Urban Management, 41(60).
Amiri, M., & Jahani, S. (2010). Application of IDEA/AHP for Supplier Evaluation and Selection. Industrial Management Journal, 2(2), 5–22.
Azadi, A., Sabzalipour, F., Badpa, B., (2019). Investigating the effect of outsourcing on productivity (case study: Ilam Gas Treating Co.). MS thesis in accounting. Bakhtar Higher Institution of Education.
Baatartogtokh, B., Dunbar, S. W., Zyl, D. V. (2018). The state of outsourcing in the Canadian mining industry. Resources Policy, 59, 184–191.
Bowden, J.L.H., Conduit, J., Hollebeek, L.D., Luoma-aho, V. & Solem, B.A. (2017). Engagement valence duality and spillover effects in online brand communities. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(4), 877–897.
Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Jurić, B., and Ilić, A. (2011). Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research, Journal of service research, 14(3), 252–271.
Ebrahimi, A., & Mansouri, M. (2013). Investigating the effect of brand image and service quality on relationship marketing and behavioral tendencies of customers. Journal of business management perspective, 12(15). 
Feizabadi, J., Karimi Dastjerdi, D. (2011). Strategic Supply Chain Management (Case Studies in the Iranian Automotive Industry). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Trans. By Hadi Jalili. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
Franco, R., Yoshizaki, H., Vieira, J. (2016). A system dynamics approach to logistics outsourcing policies and decisions. Production, 26 (2), 285–302.
Ge, J., Gretzel, U. (2018). A taxonomy of value Cocreation on Weibo–a communication perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(4), 2075–2092.
Grisseman, U, Stockburger, S. (2012). Customer Cocreation of travel services: The role of company supports and customer satisfaction with the cocreation performance. Tourism Management, 33(6), 1483–1492.
Groeger, L., Moroko, L. & Hollebeek, L.D. (2016). Capturing value from non-paying consumers’ engagement behaviors: Field evidence and development of a theoretical model. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(3/4),190–209.
Haddadian, A., Rahimnia, F., Asbforoushani, A. (2016). The effect of national identity on the perceived value of the product through evaluating the perceived product and customer bias. MA thesis in economics. The Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
Hasanzadeh, A., Jafarian, A. (2010). Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains. Tehran: Modiran-e Emrooz Publications.
Homburg, C., Jozi_c, D. & Kuehnl, C. (2017). Customer experience management: toward implementing an evolving marketing concept. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 45, No. 3, 377–401.
Jaakkola, E., Alexander, M. (2014). The role of customer engagement behavior in value cocreation: A service system perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247–261.
Jafarnezhad, A., Morovati Sharifabadi, A., Asadia Ardakani, F. (2013). Selective Topics in Supply Chain Management. Tehran: Mehraban Publication.
Javashi Jadid, S., Taherikia, F., Jalali, S. M., and Tabrizian, B. (2020). Introducing a Model of Value Cocreation with Customers in the Tourism Industry. Innovation Management in Defensive Organizations, 3(1), 119–146.
Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections, and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.
Madah, M., & Salavati Sarcheshmeh, B. (2005). Technological Synergy: Resources Development model in Developing Countries. Roshd-e Fanavari Journal, 1(3), 35–42.
Mainardes, E. W., Teixeira, A., Romano, P.C.S. (2017). Determinants of Cocreation in banking services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(2), 187–204.
Mayrand, F., Cassivi, L., Cloutier, L. (2013). Critical success factors of the offshore outsourcing of software development projects: A system dynamic approach. International system dynamic conference. Cambridge, MA, USA, July 21–25.
Modak, M., Pathak, K., Ghosh, K. (2017). Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and Fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resources Policy, 52, 181–191.
Mojir, N., & Sudhir, K. (2022). EXPRESS: A Structural Model of Organizational Buying: Innovation Adoption with Share of Wallet Contracts. Journal of Marketing Research, 00222437221084986.
Ojugbele, H. & Bodhanya, S. (2015). A Managerial Application of System Dynamics Modeling to Outsourcing. Kybernetes, 44 (4), 536–554.
Oldemaat, L. (2013). Cocreation: The ‘P’ of Participation. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.
Rahmanseresht, H., Khashei Varnamkhasti, V., Ebrahimi, M., & Rahimian, M. (2018). Strategic Value Cocreation Model in Banking Industry. Public Management Researches, 11(40), 27–52.
Ranjbarfard, M., Heidari, M. (2016). Providing a flexible and collaborative learning and educational framework for Value Cocreation in virtual learning. MPRA Paper 114736, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Ryu, K., Han, H. & Kim, T.H. (2018) The Relationships among Overall Quick-Casual Restaurant Image, Perceived Value, Customer Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, 459–469.
Sarlak, M. A. (2016). Introducing a Conceptual Framework to Processing Commotion–Goal Theory. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management, 4(4), 131–143.
Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (2006). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd edition. Trans. By Buik Mohammadi. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Tapscott, D., Williams, A. (2013). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Penguin.
Van Hoek, R. (2021). Larger, Counter-intuitive and Lasting–The PSM role in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, exploring opportunities for theoretical and actionable advances. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27(3), 100688.
Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F. (2008b). From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 254–259.
Volvic Chen, Ch., Chen, Ch., Lin, M.J. (2015). The impact of customer participation: the employee’s perspective, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 30(5), 486–497.
Vzifehdoust, H., Ghalandari, K. (2016). Investigating the influential factors of consumer purchase behavior toward the formulation of marketing strategies. The 5th International Congress Sustainable Engineering and Management and Accounting Science.
Williams, J.P.J. (2014). Identifying the Organizational Capability for Value Cocreation. Master of Philosophy in Management Studies, University of Exeter.
Zhu, Xiaowei. )2015). Management the risks of outsourcing: Time, quality and correlated costs. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90, 121–133. 

  • Receive Date 30 October 2023
  • Revise Date 23 January 2024
  • Accept Date 28 January 2024