Quarterly Publication

Comparison of the Effect of Income Inequality and Petrol Quotas on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Economics Department, Social and Economics Science Faculty, Alzahra University

2 Economics Department, Economics and Political Science Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract
Income distribution and environmental destruction represent two of the most important goals in the Sustainable Development Goals. However, the linkage between income inequality and carbon emissions remains controversial especially in countries with natural oil and gas resources. This paper studies the link between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and income inequality in Iran over 1985–2020. The modelling results indicate that there is a trade-off between income inequality and CO2 emissions. By applying the Vector Auto regression approach found a direct relationship between Gini coefficient and CO2 emissions and indirect relationship between petrol price and CO2 emissions. Petrol price have a smaller although negative impact on CO2 emissions compared to the positive effect of inequality. To investigate the effect of shocks, Impulse response checked out. According to the variance decomposition, income inequality after carbon dioxide emissions is the most explanatory change in gas emissions among other variables. This paper presents a positive effect of petrol price shocks on carbon dioxide emissions, and also negative effect on carbon dioxide emissions in long term.

Keywords

Subjects

Andrew, J., Juliet, S., and Xiaorui, H. (2017). Income Inequality and Carbon Emissions in the United 
States: A State-level Analysis, 1997–2012. Ecological Economics, 40–48. doi: 
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.016 
84 Petroleum Business Review, Vol. 7 (2023), No. 4 
Balezentis , T., Liobikiene, G., Streimikiene, D., and Sun, K. (2020). The impact of income inequality 
on consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions at the global level: A partially linear approach. 
Journal of Environmental Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110635
Baležentis, T., Liobikienė, G., Štreimikienė, D., and Sun, K. (2020). The impact of income inequality 
on consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions at the global level: A partially linear approach. 
Journal of Environmental Management, 267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110635 
Baloch, M., and Danish. (2022). The nexus between renewable energy, income inequality, and 
consumption-based CO2 emissions: An empirical investigation. Sustainable Development. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2315 
Blazquez, J., Maria Martin-Moreno, J., Perez, R., and Ruiz, J. (2017). Fossil Fuel Price Shocks and CO2
Emissions: The Case of Spain. The Energy Journal, 38, 161–176. Retrieved from 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26534394 
Canavire-Bacarreza, G., Gayoso de Ervin, L., Galeano, J. J., and Baquero, J. P. (2022, December). 
Understanding the Distributional Impacts of Increases in Fuel Prices on Poverty and Inequality in 
Paraguay. World Bank Group. 
David, P., and Montag, J. (2014). Taxing Car-produced Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Matching the Cure 
to the Disease. Procedia Economics and Finance, 111–120. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-
5671(14)00326-8 
Dong, K., Dou, Y., and Jiang, Q. (2022). Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: 
Who cause who and how? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121622 
Dou, Y., Zhao, J., Dong, X., and Dong, K. (2021). Quantifying the impacts of energy inequality on 
carbon emissions in China: A household-level analysis. Energy Economics. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105502 
Golley, J., and Meng, X. (2012). Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese 
urban households. Energy Economics, 1864–1872. doi: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.025 
Hu, Wenjun; (2017). Fiscal Expenditure, Trade Openness, and Income Distribution. Finance Trade 
Econ, 38, 35–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2018-070304 
Khan, A., Saleem, N., and Fatima, S. (2018). Financial development, income inequality, and CO2
emissions in Asian countries using the STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution 
Research, 6308–6319. 
Li, N., Ulucak , R., and Danish. (2022). Turning points for environmental sustainability: the potential 
role of income inequality, human capital, and globalization. Environmental Science and Pollution 
Research, 40878–40892. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18223-6 
Magnani, Elisabetta; (2000). The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy, and 
income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 431–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-
8009(99)00115-9 
Milan, B., and Creutzig, F. (2017). Lifting peripheral fortunes: Upgrading transit improves spatial, 
income, and gender equity in Medellin. Cities, 122–134. doi: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.019 
Dadgar, M. and Varahrami, V. / Comparison of the Effect of Income Inequality … 85 
Nikodinoska , D., and Schröder , C. (2016). On the emissions–inequality and emissions–welfare tradeoffs in energy taxation: Evidence on the German car fuels tax. Resource and Energy Economics, 
206–233. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.03.001 
Perrier, Q., Guivarch, C., and Boucher, O. (2019). Diversity of greenhouse gas emission drivers across 
European countries since the 2008 crisis. Climate Policy, 1067–1087. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1625744 
Raszkowski, A., and Bartniczak, B. (2018). Towards sustainable regional development: Economy, 
society, environment, good governance based on the example of Polish regions. Transformations 
in Business and Economics, 225–245. 
Sampedro, J., Iyer, G., Msangi, S., Waldhoff, S., Hejazi, M., and Edmonds, J. (2022). Implications of 
different income distributions for future residential energy demand in the U.S. Environmental 
Research letters. 
Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., and Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Trade openness–carbon emissions 
nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Economics, 
61, 221–232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008 
Sharaai, A., Mokhtar, A., Jin, N., and Azali, N. (2015). Determining the primary factor contributing to 
household carbon emission using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Procedia Environmental 
Sciences, 344 – 348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.061 
Soava , G., Mehedintu , A., and Sterpu , M. (2020). Relations between Income Inequality, Economic 
Growth, and Poverty Threshold: New Evidence from EU Countries Panels. Econ. Dev. Econ., 
290–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846 /
Sommerfeld, Miguel A. Tovar-Reanos Katrin; (2017). Fuel for inequality: Distributional effects of 
environmental reforms on private transport. Resource and Energy Economics, 1–48. doi: 
https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.007 
Sovacool, B., Lipson, M., and Chard, R. (2019). Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in 
household low carbon innovations. Energy Policy, 495–504. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.010 
Wang, M., and Feng, C. (2021). The inequality of China’s regional residential CO2 emissions. 
Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2047–2057. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.05.003 
Zhao, J., Jiang, Q., Dong, X., and Dong, K. (2020). Would environmental regulation improve the 
greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case studies. Energy Economics, 87. doi: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104712

  • Receive Date 07 December 2022
  • Revise Date 02 May 2023
  • Accept Date 19 June 2023