Quarterly Publication
Author = Saeid daneshi
Oil and Gas Economics and Management

Naphtha Demand Modeling and Its Implications for Refining Configuration in the Era of Energy Transition

Volume 10, Issue 2, Spring 2026

https://doi.org/10.22050/pbr.2026.570861.1427

Afshar Bazyar, Saeid daneshi

Abstract In the context of the energy transition and increasingly stringent climate policies, understanding oil demand requires a product-specific perspective that goes beyond aggregate indicators. This study examines naphtha, a key feedstock linking the refining and petrochemical sectors, and analyzes the factors associated with its demand across ten major oil-consuming countries during 2000–2024. Using long-term panel data, naphtha prices are first modeled as a function of crude oil prices through an ARMA specification, after which a naphtha demand equation is estimated with cross-section fixed effects and a lagged dependent variable. The results indicate that naphtha demand is significantly associated with economic growth and downstream petrochemical product prices, especially olefins and aromatics. The positive and statistically significant lagged demand term suggests persistence and gradual adjustment in consumption, consistent with structural inertia in petrochemical feedstock use. Overall, the findings suggest that the energy transition may reshape the composition of oil demand rather than lead to a uniform decline across all petroleum products. The results provide policy-relevant insights for product-specific energy-transition strategies, refinery reconfiguration, and refinery–petrochemical integration, while underscoring that the estimated relationships should be interpreted as conditional associations rather than causal effects.

Oil and Gas Economics and Management

Revisiting the Guarantee Mechanisms in Financing Upstream Oil and Gas Projects: Emphasis on Non-Governmental Guarantee Funds

Volume 9, Issue 4, Autumn 2025, Pages 20-42

https://doi.org/10.22050/pbr.2025.525871.1395

Saeid Daneshi, AbbAS Kazemi Najafabadi

Abstract Financing upstream oil and gas projects in Iran—particularly for non-governmental companies—faces numerous obstacles, including the lack of effective guarantee mechanisms, absence of credible collaterals, limited access to sovereign guarantees, and the skepticism of financial institutions. This paper, adopting a descriptive-analytical approach and grounded in the study of existing legal and institutional frameworks, explores the legal capacities for designing and utilizing alternative instruments to traditional guarantees in the financing process of high-risk projects. Within this framework, and based on the “Production and Infrastructure Financing Act”, the executive bylaw on the establishment of non-governmental guarantee funds, and other upstream legal documents, the establishment of an institution titled the "Oil Guarantee Fund" is proposed as an innovative solution. This fund is designed to mitigate default risk, facilitate project credit assessment, and replace bank or property-based guarantees for companies active in the oil and gas value chain. Its legal structure is envisioned based on the model of non-governmental institutions and private joint-stock companies. The proposed model has been formulated through a legal analysis of the relevant documents and informed by the outcomes of expert panels comprising specialists in energy law, finance, and public policy. Findings of the study indicate that the establishment of such a fund, capable of issuing valid guarantees based on contractual commitments, provides a practical tool to strengthen institutional trust and facilitate investment in upstream oil and gas projects. The article also presents a conceptual and institutional framework for the fund and offers recommendations for its policy-level and legal implementation.