Quarterly Publication

Document Type : Original Article


1 Professor, Economics Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Economics Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

3 Associate Professor Economics Department, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Institute for International Energy Studies, Tehran, Iran

5 Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz



Currently, distribution of various types of petroleum products is performed exclusively by the government. The high price of land in metropolitan cities, lack of incentive for the private sector to invest in construction of filling station due to the low-income, have caused filling stations to be insufficiently available. One of the solutions to overcome this obstacle is to use the ability of the private sector for distribution of petroleum products. To reduce the government's ownership, the market structure for petroleum products distribution in the country needs to be changed. This change should be firstly done gradually and step by step, and secondly, the government has to monitor this issue at various stages. In this study, three stages are proposed for the market restructuring of the petroleum products distribution in the country, and the conditions and requirements for each stage are separately identified.
For the private fuel distributing companies, the most important problem is the economic issue and having profit. On the other hand, since the product price is still subsidized in the country, therefore, it is indispensable that the amount of commission fee should be determined in such a way that the activity for private companies is economically justified.
In this study, the amount of products commision fee is calculated concerning capital and operatational expenditures, using the engineering economics method in different situations by COMFAR version 3 software.


Main Subjects

-Australian Institute of Petroleum, Downstream Petroleum 2011, www.aip.com.au

-Christopher Ehinomen, Adepoju Adeleke. (2012) “An assessment of the distribution of Petroleum Products in Nigeria”, Journal of Business Management and Economics Vol. 3(6). pp. 232-241, June

-Dehghani, Amir (1392), "Examining the Benefits and Disadvantages of the Wage System and Comparing Its Comparative Comparison with the Commission fee System in Fuel stations of the National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company," M.Sci Dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Naregh School of Management.

-Downstream Petroleum 2011, Australian Institute of Petroleum Ltd

-Etabi, F, Mahoutchi Saeed, K, Abedi, Z, (1386), "Cost Analysis - Benefits of Construction and Exploitation of Single-Use CNG Fuel Station in Tehran City," Quarterly Journal of Energy Economics, 14 (4). 119-97.

-Global Industrial Restructuring, ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD) Business and Industry Policy Forum Reports on Proceedings, 2002, http://www.oecd.org/sti/business-forums

-Hasan Ünal, (2011), the Turkish Downstream Petroleum Industry – Analysis of Market Efficiency, Bergen, autumn

-Ignacio Contín, Aad Correljé and Emilio Huerta, The Spanish distribution system of oil products: an economic analysis, Nijmegen International Political Economy Centre, University of Nijmegen, 1994 (For an analysis of this process see Correljé (1990, 1994))

- Instructions for designing and constructing small fuel stations (1395), NIOPDC.

-Jamasb, T & Pollitt, MG (2005), Electricity Market Reform in European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization and Integration, CWPE Working Paper, No. 0417, University of Cambridge.

-James Eastcott, Restructuring of the Japanese Downstream Oil Market and Implications for the World Market, Energy Strategy Department, IEEJ: June 2004

-Javanmardi, Rezaee. (2009) “Economic Evaluation of Natural Gas Transportation from South-Pars Gas Field to Markets “Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 29, Issue 10, P.1-3

-Justification Analisis of fuel supply stations, (1393), Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Deputy Head of Research and Production Affairs, Office of Energy Studies, Industry and Mine.

-Kieran Clarke. (2010), India’s Downstream Petroleum Sector Refined Product Pricing and Refinery Investment, Australian Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism

-Kombo Mason Braide, (2003), Modes of Deregulation in the Downstream Sector the Nigerian Petroleum Industry http://www.nigerdeltacongress.com/marticles/modes_of_deregulation_in_the_dow.htm

-Michael Pomerleano, William Shaw (2005), Corporate Restructuring, Lessons from Experience, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank, Washington, D.C. 2005.

-Profit and Loss Statement. (1394), Financial Management, NIOPDC

-Purpartovi, M, (1394), "The Necessity of Changing the filling station System from commission Fees to Commissioning," Energy Quarterly of the NIOPDC, 8 (3): 20-12.

- Rahmani Fazli, H, Arab Mazar, A, (1395), "Optimal Provincial Allocation of Oil Budget Based on an Optimal Randomized Control Model," Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 60 (16): 182-153.

-Restructuring in Russia Oil Industry, the research center of Iranain Parliamant, the office of Infrastructure affairs, 2008

- Sattari, S, et al. (1387), CNG technical and economical justification in Iran, third-millennium pub, Tehran, 1387

-Shirijian, M, Taheri Fard, A, Asgari, M.M, (1394), "Structural Analysis of the Comparison of Optimal Levels of Investment and Oil Production in Upstream buyback Contracts of Participation shares in Oil Production and Contract", Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 58 (15): 158 -111.

-Svetoslav Danchev and George Maniatis. (2014), the Refining Sector in Greece: Contribution to the Economy and Prospects, Foundation for Economic and Industrial Research


-Tavanpour, M, Kazemi, Kh, (1386), "Technical-Economic Assessment of Construction of GTL Production Units in the Country," Quarterly Journal of Energy Economics, 15 (4): 166-143.

-U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2003. “2003 California Gasoline Price Study: Final Report.” Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration Approach”, Energy Economics, 32, 110- 120.